Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Wall Street Pay Rises; Worker's Pay Does Not

Bonuses on Wall Street rose 9% in 2012, nearing former record highs, at the same time that pay for U.S. workers continues to stagnate.  Up until the 1970s, worker compensation and productivity rose simultaneously, rewarding workers for gains in productivity.  However, since 1978, worker compensation has flatlined while productivity has increased markedly.  The benefits of greater productivity have gone almost exclusively to shareholders and corporate executives and not to the employees driving the gains.  "Companies are on a tear in terms of productivity and profits, but they aren't sharing much of the gains with their workers. . . .  Productivity, which measures the goods and services generated per hour worked, rose by 80.4% between 1973 and 2011, compared to a 10.7% growth in median hourly compensation . . . ."

With unemployment still hampering many American workers, bonus pay on Wall Street is projected to rise another 8%  in 2013.  Despite the increase in compensation, Wall Street banks continue to slash jobs to cut costs and spur profits. Meanwhile, "[e]mployers are achieving their gains with fewer workers []. U.S. economic activity is now 2.5% higher than it was when the recession began in late 2007, but there are more than 3 million fewer workers on the job, said Mark Perry, a scholar at the conservative American Enterprise Institute." To that end, Wall Street continues its tone deaf march intent on enriching its executives at the expense of its employees and the United States economy.

5 comments:

  1. "The benefits of greater productivity have gone almost exclusively to shareholders and corporate executives and not to the employees driving the gains."

    Employees are not driving the gains in productivity. Investment in technology has been the cause of increased productivity. In other words, capital, not labor has been responsible for the gains. And since it is the shareholders who provide the capital and take the associated risks, it is the shareholders who should rightfully benefit. Economics 101.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Since when are shareholders taking risks? The Bernanke helicopter put has got that covered.

    As for business investment, your point would be more compelling if it was true...
    The Other Economic Cliff: Why Business Investment Is Really Nosediving:
    http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/11/the-other-economic-cliff-why-business-investment-is-really-nosediving/265424/


    ReplyDelete
  3. "As for business investment, your point would be more compelling if it was true..." -- McMike

    From the link embedded in the post above:

    "Productivity, which measures the goods and services generated per hour worked, rose by 80.4% between 1973 and 2011 ..."

    From your link:

    "Meanwhile, there is still the fact that equipment, software, and construction investment has been declining among major corporations for the last four quarters ..."

    You're having a little trouble with your time frames. Too much pot can do that.

    Here try this:

    "The 1990's Acceleration in Labor Productivity: Causes and Measurement, Kansas City Fed":

    http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=18&ved=0CF8QFjAHOAo&url=http%3A%2F%2Fresearch.stlouisfed.org%2Fpublications%2Freview%2F06%2F05%2FAnderson.pdf&ei=_ypKUd-vC8WDyAGql4GoAQ&usg=AFQjCNEjwBnwLkuGNWGsU8qhtPoF9bqHwA&sig2=ohU5I5gewsuSPBFHZJ83Xw

    ReplyDelete
  4. It is not markets that are determining the allocation of gains from increased productivity. It is rigged markets and regulation, including too big to fail.

    The key is the divergence that dre highlights in the graph--it diverges just as inequality (with all its pernicious political effects) soars.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winner-Take-All_Politics

    ReplyDelete
  5. Many thanks for this brilliant post! Many points have extremely useful. Hopefully you'll continue sharing your knowledge around.
    new york workers compensation

    ReplyDelete