Recent financial
scandals and the relative paucity of criminal prosecutions against elite actors
that benefited from the crisis in response suggest a new reality in the criminal
law system: some wrongful actors appear to be above the law and immune from
criminal prosecution. As such, the criminal prosecutorial system affirms much of
the wrongdoing giving rise to the crisis. This leaves the same elites
undisturbed at the apex of the financial sector, and creates perverse incentives
for any successors. Their incumbency in power results in massive deadweight
losses due to the distorted incentives they now face. Further, this undermines
the legitimacy of the rule of law and encourages even more lawlessness among the
entire population, as the declination of prosecution advertises the
profitability of crime. These considerations transcend deterrence as well as
retribution as a traditional basis for criminal punishment. Affirmance is far
more costly and dangerous with respect to the crimes of powerful elites that
control large organizations than can be accounted for under traditional notions
of deterrence. Few limits are placed on a prosecutor’s discretionary decision
about whom to prosecute, and many factors against prosecution take hold,
especially in resource-intensive white collar crime prosecutions. This article
asserts that prosecutors should not decline prosecution in these circumstances
without considering its potential affirmance of crime. Otherwise, the
profitability of crime promises massive future losses.
The article does not include the deeply disturbing testimony of Attorney General Eric Holder that banks and criminals employed by banks are not subject to criminal procecustions on the same basis as ordinary citizens because that absurd testimony is too recent. Still, Holder's admission that some banks and their criminal employees are too big to jail certainly raises the importance and timliness of Professor Mary Ramirez' most recent installment seeking to restore balance to a ridiculously out of whack criminal "justice" system.
What does it say about a society that rounds up young people of color by the thousands for relatively innocuous behavior while white collar criminals on Wall Street can crash global capitalism and corrupt the pinnacle of our economy with impunity? So much for any post-racial America.
The social construct of race still thrives in America and nowhere is this more obvious than in policies relating to incarceration.
The social construct of race still thrives in America and nowhere is this more obvious than in policies relating to incarceration.
No comments:
Post a Comment